Within days, a thread clarified Husqvarna "Model 1600" as having become popular generic nomenclature and referring to the models ostensibly within such general category. Thanks particularly to Baribol and all contributing to that thread, which I found very informative/demystifying!
Now, turning to the Husqvarna generic "Model 640", please confirm whether my listing below, representing specimens of my Husqvarnas, is an accurate assessment of models within that 'umbrella'. Here set forth 'more less' chronologically.
1. FN action 98, late forties-mid fifties, solid-sidewall/low scope bolt, multi-chamberings.
2. FN action 98, early postwar, thumb-sidewall/mil bolt, 8x57.
3. Husqvarna 96 action, late mid-war to early postwar, solid-sidewall/mil, Euro-chamberings
4. FN. action 98, late prewar to mid-war, Thumb-sidewall/ bolt, Euro-chamberings.
Thanks sincerely for clarification/confirmation.
Best!
John
Now, turning to the Husqvarna generic "Model 640", please confirm whether my listing below, representing specimens of my Husqvarnas, is an accurate assessment of models within that 'umbrella'. Here set forth 'more less' chronologically.
1. FN action 98, late forties-mid fifties, solid-sidewall/low scope bolt, multi-chamberings.
2. FN action 98, early postwar, thumb-sidewall/mil bolt, 8x57.
3. Husqvarna 96 action, late mid-war to early postwar, solid-sidewall/mil, Euro-chamberings
4. FN. action 98, late prewar to mid-war, Thumb-sidewall/ bolt, Euro-chamberings.
Thanks sincerely for clarification/confirmation.
Best!
John
I think we're parallel concerning the others. My lament is the apparent nonsensical approach of the firm designating or 'suffering' others to do such a generic designation! 
