Gunboards Forums banner

1945 dated K98 number study STICKY

29K views 54 replies 41 participants last post by  Ronbo6  
#1 · (Edited)
originally posted by Pisgah...

Please add your number that will extend or drop down the serial numbers below for each manufacture...


As they're estimates, they're all off to some extent. His numbers from 1945 are the farthest off of any of the years due to all of the changes which were instituted late war by the different manufacturers. Here are examples from 1945 including Law's estimates, and why they're wrong:

1. Mauser Oberndorf
Law estimated 205,591 based on the known high svw 45 at the time being numbered 5593b. Law ignored svwMB production as many consider this code to be all French postwar manufactured. I think this belief is unlikely, but will deal with just byf 45 and svw 45 for the sake of comparison. The old KCN ran a serial number study for 1945 Mauser Oberndorfs in 1997. The high number found in that study for the no suffix block of byf 45 was 59,467. The high number a block svw 45 found was 16205a. The high number found for svw 45 in the b block was 5593b. So, actual production for byf 45 and svw 45 was less than 83,000. I say "less than" because some of the byf 45's and svw 45's were rejected by the Waffenamt inspectors and never completed during the war (despite having been assigned serial numbers) and were eventually completed by the French postwar. Law didn't account for the rejected rifles and didn't account for the fact that Mauser Oberndorf never completed any of the 5 digit number blocks of rifles (leading many to believe that the serial number blocks at Mauser Oberndorf corresponded to months of the year from 1943 until the end of the war).

2. Gustloff
Law estimated 91,679 rifles based on the known high serial number of bcd 45 being 91679. The problem is that bcd 4's are known to exist with serial numbers all the way up to the 90 thousand range. When found with five digit serial numbers and in original condition, bcd 4's have late features--semi-Kriegsmodell, complete or partial phosphate finish, rougher machining marks, and fewer serial numbered parts. Based on the fact that these features didn't show up at any manufacturer until late 1944, it's pretty reasonable to assume that Gustloff mixed bcd 4 and bcd 45 receivers in their 1945 production. The best I can offer you with this code is a guess. I see 4-5 (or more) bcd 4's with the five digit serial number for every bcd 45 I see. Part of this is certainly due to the fact that collectors know bcd 45 is uncommon and don't sell them often. So, I would guess that the actual number of bcd 45's was around 20-25,000.

3. Steyr
Law estimated 196,625 bnz 45's and based this on the high known serial number for a bnz 45 being 5935t. The problem with this is that the high known serial number for bnz. 4 is 4917q and the low known serial number for bnz 45 is 4166q. This makes it look like Steyr had continuous numbering from 1944 on. So, likely the q block was a mix of bnz.4 and bnz 45 marked receivers. From what I have read, the final Steyr code (unknown at the time BBOTW was written) was swj XE, and known examples of this code are in the t block. So, a more realistic estimate of 1945 Steyr production would be 36,000.

4. Bystrica
Law estimated 29,712 rifles produced at Bystrica based on the high known serial number being 9079b. Since the Russian capture rifles have been imported since then, I have seen dou.45 serial numbers all the way into the f serial number block. Based on this, a more realistic estimate of dou.45 production would be 70,000.

5. Bruenn
Law estimated 187,684 swp 45's produced based on the low known serial number of 43026a and a high of 87685a. The high known serial number of dot 1944 was 43125a. So the situation at Bruenn seems to resemble what I described at Gustloff. It looks like this factory had a surplus of dot 1944 marked receivers and used them when they started the five digit serial number pattern at the start of 1945. I have seen Russian capture swp 45's with serial numbers in the high 90 thousands of the a block, so based on this I would estimate production for the swp code being around 60,000.

So to sum it up for 1945:
1. Mauser Oberndorf (byf 45 and svw 45 only)= less than 83,000.
2. Bystrica= app. 70,000
3. Bruenn (swp 45 only)= app. 60,000
4. Steyr= app. 36,000
5. Gustloff (bcd 45 only)= app. 20-25,000

Notice that I believe that 1944 dated receivers were used in 1945 produced rifles at Bruenn and Gustloff and this is why I specified that my estimates were for rifles with 1945 dated receivers only instead of total production of rifles for that year. Quite a bit of overkill here in answering your question, but I have frequently alluded to Law's numbers being way off on this board, so took the opportunity to illustrate why
 
#37 ·
Kurdt, I'd like to know more about your dou.45. I have dou.45, SN 9393 e. It was a Russian Capture that I bought from Empire Arms and found what I'm pretty sure is a dou made Km stock set to mount it in. I'd like to know more about your 2 f rifle. I assume yours was an RC as well? Do you have any photos of the rifle showing the details such as waffenamts and and serial numbers on any of the parts that might be original to the rifle? What type of stock was the rifle mounted in? Can you tell what the original finish is or was on the rifle? Have you found any markings under the wood line of the stock?
 
#36 ·
Richuric, pretty cool as I have a SWP45 made just 30 rifles after yours, pretty amazing. Likely went out on the same day!

Question though, mine is an RC. The receiver I believe was phosphate finished as its very grey and just doesnt feel right as a normal reblued RC. Would the receiver on yours also happen to be ph finish? Mine is 64312.
 
#38 ·
Preduzece44- I have an all matching dou45 serial 2944e. It's the highest one I've seen so far that matches. 2f is pretty late, highest I have seen is 801f. I'm sure there is a later dou45 though, just haven't seen it yet- it will probaby be an RC like 801f is.
 
#39 ·
Hi Preduzece44, my rifle is a russian capture bought in italy. Soon i wish to show you some photos. Now i can tell you that the stock is a Kriegsmodell type, but with cleaning rod and the classic take-down hole. He show a WaA 135 (right side) and the stamping "2" on the left ( by russky? Under the handguard when it's disassembled there is another ser#). Near the hole for the sling there is a 0 (zero) or a O stamped.. no one know what is it? The serial number is the same only for the barrel (a 2 under the handguard in front of the sight) and receiver. The bands aren't stamped and on metal parts of the rifle you can find other WaA like 665 and 280. The barrel has the correct WaA80 and dou with HZ marks. The finish of the rifle is the same when i bought.. black, and i know it was made by the russian. Now i have a question.. what do you think about my rifle? Is it a "frankenstein" or late-war conditions made it?
 
#41 ·
RC dou. 45 s/n 5906 C BBL code; H A dou * l , A 80 X 4 ( Upper case S stamped under the H in bbl code ) waA 214 Walnut stock, ser #2689 on bottom of stock and bbl. channel , luftwaffe L under waa 214 on right side of buttstock , 10 inch C.R.
 
#48 ·
Dou 45, ser.# 7959 b, all matching except cocking piece. Stamped bands, laminate stock, stamped bottom metal with large trigger guard for gloved hand. Barrel maker H T, two A80 Wa's, dou stamp, Nazi eagle and prancing lion left side of bbl., hooded front sight, prancing lion and SN on l/h side of rec. ring.

I bought this in 1965 for $25.00 and wasted no time in wildcatting it to 8mm-06, installing the action into a Bishop stock and tossing the military stock, because they were so prevalent and so cheap. Had I only known!!!