Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 1 of 8 Posts
I suppose I will put my foot in it again, but: I am not a fan of shellac on the Mosin rifles (or even most furniture) due to it's rather fragile nature. A proper french polish is a nice indoor furniture finish as long as it is properly done and well treated, add a water ring from a glass and it can fade as the water dries; wipe it off harshly and you can remove some of the finish. Not real world durable, but a pretty wood finish.

With the Mosin I have noticed that the finish is a sloppy mess applied in poor conditions at some type of gulag facility with no real wood preparation; the "hysterical" collectors get easily bent when this finish is removed. I have (currently) a 1944 and 1948 M44's that show differing finishes; one is laminated wood that is re-arsenalled and coated with red shellac that feels tacky to the touch (it is staying on the wood for a change) the 1948 gun has not been refurbed and is a seemingly oil based finish that lets the blond wood color show and is attractive and not sticky in the slightest.
My feeling is that regardless of the procedure the shellac simply can not be well adhered to a previously oil finished (or oil stained) wood without a complete de-waxing or stripping that just was not done (or done well) during the common 3rd world re-arsenal process done in the soviet sphere. I have had shellac come off on my hands and stick to my face when shooting some of my Mosins, it may be due to humidity and sweat while shooting, but in South Louisiana there are few times that it is not humid. I suppose that I am no fan of the shellac, and I may start the fur flying with my comments; I will apologize in advance. I really do not think the majority of the red shellac is done well or is period correct for a battle rifle, it is simply not durable enough to do it's primary job of protecting the wood against moisture and damage to have served any real purpose.
 
1 - 1 of 8 Posts