Gunboards Forums banner
21 - 34 of 34 Posts
Discussion starter · #27 ·
I wonder what the service life would be for a vintage piece like this? did they use any heat treating back then?
I don't think they did any heat treating at all... there are a lot of cases of over-powered rounds mushrooming and cracking the part of metal that supports the slide lock. Seems soft overall... I know the finish is incredibly soft. In fact, I believe the first few thousand 1911s (Navy Contract maybe? I'm going off memory) had this same finish and the US Mil demanded they change it. Someone more familiar will correct me
 
That would be a hard call for me. On one hand, look just like it came from the factory. On the other - all the history implicit in the worn surface is GONE. As I say, a hard call.
I have to agree,the consensus at least here in the us is to leave it as is.
I'll get the colt letter for sure,can't wait to see who it was sent to when new.
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
Your pistol is listed as On Loan Account to Major Samuel J Fort, shipped November 29th 1909 and returned Jan 1 1909 (should maybe be 1910?). I did a bit of research and Major Saml Fort was assigned the position of Inspector of Small-Arms practice for the Maryland National Guard in September of 1908. So that's pretty neat!! It'd be interesting to know where it went after having been returned to Colt a month or two after being sent out.
 
Discussion starter · #34 ·
Doubtful. Back in the '80s when Colt was under different owners, Goddard had access to the Colt archives and permission (sometimes contested by current Colt Archive Properties LLC) to publish some of the data in his book "The Government Models" - highly recommended btw. He published all the special order results from models 1900-1910, and nearly all the data from the C prefix 1911s. This represents about 10% of all data Colt has.

The information in the book about my piece (#2750) is inclusive of everything I got with the letter. The only difference is the books says F.C. Nichols (VP of Sales for Colt) was the recipient, while Colt Archives said the name is actually C.F. Nichols... and said it was probably a transcribing error, as that name didn't appear anywhere else.
 
21 - 34 of 34 Posts