Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 20 of 30 Posts

· Platinum Bullet member
Joined
·
19,455 Posts
I sold this guy last spring for nearly $1250 on Gunbroker. Nice rifle with staked screws, untouched mum and all matching except for the dust cover. The DC had the correct "ri" mark & was #477. Rifle was 2977.
 

· Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
15,809 Posts
There is no doubt that auctions with good pictures are the place to get maximum prices for most anything, rifles, swords, pistols, medals.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
169 Posts
I am amazed at how many auctions , by dealers, have minimal/bad pictures. I email and get varying answers from "that's the best I have" or "when I get around to it". I guess to many it's just a "Jap rifle". They could be leaving a lot of money on the table.
 

· Copper Bullet member
Joined
·
2,670 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
I sold this guy last spring for nearly $1250 on Gunbroker. Nice rifle with staked screws, untouched mum and all matching except for the dust cover. The DC had the correct "ri" mark & was #477. Rifle was 2977.

Hello Arisakadogs....Please help me out. DC ??, ri mark ??, What screws should be staked? Regards, Rick.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,025 Posts
DC + dust cover...ri mark is the proof mark DC should have a corect inspection proof as well as the last digits of the serial.just correct numbers isnt a match,same as with a bolt,must be all correct proofs also, ri is the ij mark of nagoya arsenal, and all major screws should be staked tightly.
 

· Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
2,287 Posts
i am with renovate 7 when it comes to people trying to move rifles especially high end rifles with crap pictures taken from more than 100 meters or with flash burn that obscures the item.it it just makes the rifle suspect... there was a k98 turret rifle on gunbroker a month ago which looked ,parts and patina wise, like it was faked by an expert or possibly real.i would have beaten the reserve price it sold for easily had the seller 1.responded to questions 2. given a three day inspection period and 3.most importantly, posted photos taken with a macro lens of all the critical parts, stamps, numbers, and cartouhes etc.
 

· Copper Bullet member
Joined
·
2,670 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
I need to look at my Type 99 and see if the screws are staked. What was the purpose in doing this? I've never seen a dust cover....I heard the soldiers hated them and they were "lost" in combat. Regards, Rick.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
293 Posts
I need to look at my Type 99 and see if the screws are staked. What was the purpose in doing this? I've never seen a dust cover....I heard the soldiers hated them and they were "lost" in combat. Regards, Rick.
Staking the screws was a method used to prevent them from loosening up. What you "heard" regarding dust covers is probably best described as "urban legend".
 

· Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
15,809 Posts
Sakorick,
pay attention to the many programs with original WWII footage on tv, most if not all of the rifles have their dust covers.
 

· Copper Bullet member
Joined
·
2,670 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Sakorick,
pay attention to the many programs with original WWII footage on tv, most if not all of the rifles have their dust covers.
Hello 03man...me too by the way(03).....I'm sure you are correct.....What was the dust cover supposed to do? Personally after shooting many rifles for 50 years now, I don't get the rationale for one. There isn't a MILSURP rifle I own from any country or any model that has a dust cover.....of course someone will point one out I'm sure! Here is my type 99. I love this rifle! Regards, Rick.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,025 Posts
Actually most other countries didnt fight war on the frozen side of the chinese and russian wastelands ,where frozen dust often had 50% of rifle inoperable,at times. Also lots of countries had action covers even the US ,03 you guys love so much,LOL.but they didnt build it right into the rifle like the japanese did,tho I think (and I have been wrong on occassion) that the brits and the french played with designs to keep sand out of actions..also if you look at modern issue weapons, a large percentage incorperate a "dustcover into the design, for rifles and machineguns(including the M-16). long as there have been longarms,there have been ideas for how to keep them free of dirt ,snow and mud
 

· Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
15,809 Posts
And don't forget the reliable AK, the safety forms a dustcover for the action when closed. Lots of armies had action covers of canvas or leather, that they tied on their rifles. Even the venerable Winchester 73 has a sliding cover on its action.
 

· Platinum Bullet member
Joined
·
19,455 Posts
The WW1 German Gew 98 had a dust cover that could be installed & could be moved out of the way when the rifle was in use. Those rifles that had it installed have bruises on the stock where it was clamped on.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
226 Posts
Well...you drop your rifle in the sand without the dustcover...you have a rifle's action full of gritty sand.

You drop your rifle in the sand with the dustcover on....your action is still good to go.

BTW that is a fantastic stock on the Arisaka..
 

· Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
3,258 Posts
From reading accounts of fighting from both Port Arthur and at Khalkin Gol/Nomahan, the Japanese soldiers had a hell of a time with dust clogging up their bolt actions. Many of them would wrap the reciever in cloth to keep as much dirt out as possible; and this is on top of having a dust cover!!
That Mongolian/Northern China dirt must be made of cement to freeze up a bolt action!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
328 Posts
The 99 at gunrunner was a series 3. The bolt and and DC matched each other, but not the gun. $560 is to much for that? Like he said, all the bells and whistles the bayo had the frog too.
 
1 - 20 of 30 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top