Joined
·
8,585 Posts
A dealer on GunBroker has a reproduction sniper done by century in the 2000s. It has a laughable scope mount and the rifle is 1937 Izhevsk.
The title is
Mosin Nagant M91/30 PU SNIPER 7.62X54R Russian WWII dated 1934 Original.
Since the forum doesn't allow live auction links you'll have to search for it using that name.
Nowhere does the description, pictures or title say it's a reproduction.. he simply states "sniper" "ww2 original" and "this could have been used in Vietnam because 1966 date".
I messaged him explaining PU snipers were not built until 1942 and the other issues with the rifle including the scope mount.. I explained the only thing legit on it sniper related was the scope.
I got a very quick snappy response of "I described it exactly as you stated"
I then went on to say that no he did not and he should at least let buyers know.
His response
"The picture and description of the Century tag, the date of 1966 on the scope and date of 1934 on the gun is pretty darn clear to anyone"
People like this are what make the community a dangerous place for newbies. sellers like this who purposefully leave information out so they can say "that's your problem for not researching it" when the buyer inevitably finds out they've been sold a fake sniper after being tricked into bidding by wordplay. I agree in caveat emptor but people shouldn't exactly be baited into thinking an item is something it's not. Sales tactics like this on GunBroker are not new or uncommon.. almost only a monthly basis I see some repro sniper being passed off as legit.. usually I message the seller to let them know and most of the time I never hear back from them, sometimes they'll thank me and edit it(kudos to them).. then there's sellers like this..
Ba
The title is
Mosin Nagant M91/30 PU SNIPER 7.62X54R Russian WWII dated 1934 Original.
Since the forum doesn't allow live auction links you'll have to search for it using that name.
Nowhere does the description, pictures or title say it's a reproduction.. he simply states "sniper" "ww2 original" and "this could have been used in Vietnam because 1966 date".
I messaged him explaining PU snipers were not built until 1942 and the other issues with the rifle including the scope mount.. I explained the only thing legit on it sniper related was the scope.
I got a very quick snappy response of "I described it exactly as you stated"
I then went on to say that no he did not and he should at least let buyers know.
His response
"The picture and description of the Century tag, the date of 1966 on the scope and date of 1934 on the gun is pretty darn clear to anyone"
People like this are what make the community a dangerous place for newbies. sellers like this who purposefully leave information out so they can say "that's your problem for not researching it" when the buyer inevitably finds out they've been sold a fake sniper after being tricked into bidding by wordplay. I agree in caveat emptor but people shouldn't exactly be baited into thinking an item is something it's not. Sales tactics like this on GunBroker are not new or uncommon.. almost only a monthly basis I see some repro sniper being passed off as legit.. usually I message the seller to let them know and most of the time I never hear back from them, sometimes they'll thank me and edit it(kudos to them).. then there's sellers like this..
Ba