Joined
·
19,283 Posts
We touched on this in another thread.
There appears to be an error in Don's excellent book on the T-99 rifle. On page 89 he first says the initial rifles in the 30th series were matched by an assembly number (which is correct). But the text then says the change to using the last three digits of the serial number occured in the 30K range of the 31st series. This is where the error occurs.
MROJ 5th edition shows the change in numbering occuring with 17263 as the highest rifle matched by assembly number and 27438 as the lowest rifle matched by the last three digits of the serial number.
I have #28166 and it is matched by the assembly number - so that raises the high number quite a bit and "overlaps" the low for serial number matching. I also have #49352 and it's matched by the last three digits which is to be expected.
Anyway, the change in numbering occurs in the 30th series, not the 31st.
There appears to be an error in Don's excellent book on the T-99 rifle. On page 89 he first says the initial rifles in the 30th series were matched by an assembly number (which is correct). But the text then says the change to using the last three digits of the serial number occured in the 30K range of the 31st series. This is where the error occurs.
MROJ 5th edition shows the change in numbering occuring with 17263 as the highest rifle matched by assembly number and 27438 as the lowest rifle matched by the last three digits of the serial number.
I have #28166 and it is matched by the assembly number - so that raises the high number quite a bit and "overlaps" the low for serial number matching. I also have #49352 and it's matched by the last three digits which is to be expected.
Anyway, the change in numbering occurs in the 30th series, not the 31st.