Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
16 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have a 1917 1 Mark III* SSA with all matching SN of R1, all parts produced at RASF, and some marks I can not track down.
- underside of the bolt handle at the ball is an 'E'
- underside of the bolt handle at the body is a 'J'
- beneath the 'high velocity' stamp at the rear sight there is 'SC'
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,424 Posts
The "E" and "J" are likely factory worker's marks and if so, their meaning has been long lost.
The "SC", for "short cone", refers to a shorter freebore ahead of the chamber and is a mark associated with barrels made for the spitzer bullet of the MkVII ammunition. The Mk VI bullet had a round nose and required a longer freebore to accomodate the longer bearing surface of that projectile.
-----krinko
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,654 Posts
John, I've come to believe both BSA and Enfield received parts. Three of the four SSA's through my hands had EFD bits along with Enfield inspection marks. My remaining SSA lacks any BSA connection whatsoever.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
16 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Thanks for the input guys.
The rifle is stamped SSA on the left rear of the receiver.
There is no manufactures stamp on the collar around the but stock.
All of the parts of the rifle are stamped EFD which my understanding is the Royal Small Arms Factory (RSAF Enfield). Sorry, I just noticed I wrote RASF instead of RSAF in my original post
The bolt, reciever, barrel, rear sight, and nose cap are all stamped R1.
I will post pictures tonight when I get home from work

What stamps or marks should I expect to see on or around the front sight? Other than the SN on the nose cap.
 

· Copper Bullet member
Joined
·
575 Posts
My 1918 SSA is covered in BSA inspection markings with a couple of EFD stamps located near the serial numbers.
Mine only has BSA view marks on the barrel and the receiver; the remainder are EFD-marked parts. I wonder if BSA did the inspections for the components produced at SSA itself (which was on Lench St in Birmingham), or simply had an inspector or two on site at SSA.
 

· Copper Bullet member
Joined
·
575 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
5,693 Posts
Standard Small Arms was formed by Mr S J Waring (later Lord Waring, 1860-1940) of the Waring & Gillow concern ,together with a Mr Peterson, who was a man of standing in the Birmingham gun trade. They believed that the skills of the Birmingham gun trade were being neglected and could be more fully utilised in the war effort than they were. They planned to make all of the action and the nosecap, less magazines, screws and pins, and organise eight small firms and a number of individuals in the trade (probably outworkers, of whom a great many worked in the trade at that time). The barrels were to be subcontracted to Westley Richards and the wood to be cut by Waring & Gillow and Rudders & Payne (both these firms eventually dropped out). They contracted to supply rifles at 75/- each, which was the same price that BSA was paid. After a year or so it became apparent that the factory would never produce complete arms and it was instructed to produce four items; body with charger guide, bolt, bolt head and trigger guard. The company was to produce 1500 sets of components a week, rising to 4,000 when new machinery was installed. Other firms were contracted to produce less specialist items, the sets of components being delivered to Enfield for assembly in the bayonet shop, production of which was shifted to Wilkinsons and Sanderson Brothers & Newbold.

The downside of this scheme was that it only allowed for the exact number of components needed. Thus assembly of rifles was held up for want of quite minor items which inexperienced firms were struggling to produce. The scheme was revised in 1916 and became known as the Rifle Components Pool, taking every component which the 'Big Three' could make in excess of their complete rifle production as well as all that Standard Small Arms could turn out, and those produced by the 'peddled scheme' firms. Ordnance could also draw on the pool for repair parts. A considerable stock of components was built up so that any of the Big Three could draw on it if short of some item, and this was done continuously by LSA, and occasionally by BSA, and by Enfield (the pool being on the spot). Standard Small Arms did not attain an output of 2,000 bodies a week until April 1917 and two years after the start of work only 5-6,000 had been produced. By this time SSA were in financial difficulties and a government loan had to be made to keep them going. On June 1st 1918 the factory became National Rifle Factory No.1 with Mr Peterson as superintendent and instructed to prepare for manufacture of components of the Farquhar-Hill automatic rifle, although NRF-marked SMLE bodies were made after this. SSA seem to have turned out 2,000-4,000 bodies a week, depending on the Ministry of Munitions' requirements at the time.

 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top