Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3,814 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
FREMONT, Neb. (AP) – She may not have been the model for Rosie the Riveter.
But Rose Fields really was a riveter during World War II.

The Fremont resident was employed at the Martin Bomber Plant in Omaha in the 1940s. She worked on various planes, including the Enola Gay—the B-29 bomber that dropped the first atomic bomb used in an act of war on the Japanese city of Hiroshima in August 1945.

Since photographs weren't allowed during the war years, the 90-year-old woman has few reminders of those days. But she still has memories of a time when she—and many other women like her—did their part to help win a war.

Fields was in her early 20s when she helped build the Glenn L. Martin Co. plant, taking lumber and nails to men doing the construction. Before the war, few women worked outside the home. But most young men, unless they had a medical condition like Fields' future spouse, Lloyd, had gone to war—so women were called upon to work in factories.

“All the women had to help with those jobs,” she said.

More than 1,500 B-26 Marauder medium bombers and 500 B-29 Superfortresses were produced at the plant. In November 1944, more than 40 percent of the plant's nearly 12,000 employees were women, information from the nebraskastudies.org website states.

Fields said she went to school to learn to read blueprints. She began working in the plant after it was built.

“I built the stabilizer section below the wing,” she said.

Fields would take a rivet—a metal bolt or pin with a head—and insert it through the aligned holes in metal meant to be joined together. The other end of the rivet would be flattened out like a paper fastener. Fields said rivets were ice-cold which made them flatten better.

The job wasn't hard.

“It was fun,” she said.

Employees worked rotating shifts. Fields preferred the second shift from 3-11 p.m. That's where she met her future husband who was her foreman. Fields said her spouse was among the first to be drafted, but was classified as a 4F and turned down for military service because of a perforated eardrum due to scarlet fever he'd had as a boy. He was very disappointed about that, but proved to be a good boss at the plant.

“He was a very nice guy,” she said. “He was a good worker. He helped all the girls.”

Not every moment at the plant was pleasant.

“I just about got killed,” she said.

The close call came when she was working on a plane when the stabilizer started to close. She jumped down to safety. An inspector—who was supposed to make sure no one was in the aircraft—caused the near miss and was fired, she said.

Fields also remembers the time a plane crashed into the plant.

“We were in the parking lot,” she said. “We saw the fire ... then we found out a plane had crashed into the roof.”

The plane was a B-25 bomber from the nearby Offutt Air Field. Three crewmen were killed and a fourth was critically injured, but most workers were eating lunch outside the building, the NebraskaStudies website states. The company actually had a very good safety record, with not a single fatal industrial accident in more than 108 million man-hours of labor.

As for working on the Enola Gay, Fields said she was unaware of what role that aircraft eventually would play in history.

“We didn't know it was going to drop the (atomic) bomb, but we knew we were working on one that was going to drop a bomb,” she said.

Fields worked at the plant for two or three years. Her husband got to ride in a B-29 after his suggestion of “Omahawk” was selected as the name for the last plane ever to roll out of the factory.

The two married in 1944 and had a daughter, Linda, a grandson, Rusty, and two great-grandsons, Nick Birdsley, 11, and Mark Fleming, 7.

Fields laughs and suggests interviewing her grandsons, who are excited about her war efforts. Nick even tells people that his great-grandmother won the war. The boys have visited the Strategic Air and Space Museum at Ashland, where they've seen a photograph of a woman who worked at the plant.

Fields doesn't think it's her.

And while she did wear a bandana and blue work uniform—common among women employees of that era—Fields said she personally wasn't the model for the American icon “Rosie the Riveter.”

She does have a little lunch box with a “Rosie” on it and she has a Rosie, bobblehead figurine.

After the war, Fields and many women like her became homemakers. When Linda was in sixth grade, Field started working at Hested's Dime Store in Omaha and then at the Tip Top plant, which made hair products. She was employed there for 26 years before retiring.

She missed working at Martin plant. She missed her fellow workers.

“We made good money there, too, and we spent it,” she said.



Magazine Poster Album cover Thumb Gesture
 

· Registered
Joined
·
839 Posts
That is a great story! Where I live there used to be a plywood mill that during the early years of the war built airplane wings and only women worked there because the men were all overseas. Everyone pulled together in that effort, the women are to be exalted for their contributions to the war effort and our eventual freedom we so dearly enjoy today! Thanks for posting this, I enjoyed the read immensely!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,634 Posts
I had an aunt who worked at the old GM plant near Tarrytown, New York during the War. I was told she was a Rosie the Riveter. I read-forget where of course-that as we geared up for WWII they did all sorts of time and motion studies to make the work areas more comfortable and efficient.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
5,142 Posts
my mother put decals on airplanes during the war,while dad was in the navy. she was a slim tall lady and that helped as you had to reach to put them on. she never talked about it much,only saying she was glad to help the war effort. when you read about what things were done by the home front people it boggles the mind,the war could not have been won with out them. eastbank.
 

· Gold Bullet Member and Noted Curmudgeon
Joined
·
102,194 Posts
My mother-in-law worked for Rohr at San Diego during the war, working on sub-assemblies Rohr produced for the plants that assembled the birds. She said, when I asker her which aircraft she worked on that she didn't remember and wasn't sure she ever knew. Apparently worked on nacelles and engine mounts.

Without the ladies on shop floors, we'd never have had the planes, tanks, trucks, ships and ammo and bombs we needed to win the War. All honor to them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,634 Posts
I recall reading in one of Albert Speer's books that he said Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin demanded far more from their people than Hitler ever did, at least until 1944 or so. Italy started with a much smaller industrial base and never really engaged in economic mobilization, which explains much of Italy's dismal performance in that conflict.
 

· Gold Bullet Member and Noted Curmudgeon
Joined
·
102,194 Posts
I recall reading in one of Albert Speer's books that he said Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin demanded far more from their people than Hitler ever did, at least until 1944 or so. Italy started with a much smaller industrial base and never really engaged in economic mobilization, which explains much of Italy's dismal performance in that conflict.
Speer was entirely correct in that statement. Strategic Bombong Survey reached similar conclusions. On the other hand, the failure (or rather refusal) to go to a full wartime mobilization of German society played a role in maintaining the support of the German people for the regime and the war, or so several folks who have examined the matter have concluded. Upon consideration of American and British social support for the war, despite more complete mobilization, and comparing it to German conditions, I find myself in disagreement. Full mobilization and rationalization at an early date would have offered the Germans a better chance to obtain a favorable outcome (and without loss of home-nation social support for th war), though i think they'd have probably lost anyhow.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,000 Posts
Lots of social issues related to this.
All the able bodied men were off doing their part and the women and unfit were left to face the monumental challenge.

Up til then, gals were regulated to having babies, homemaking and menial jobs.

They came out en masse and broke lots of stereotypes.
Womans rights and related issues advanced.

Sadly, at war's end, huge numbers got sent back to the kitchen sink and available developing emplyment was given to returning GIs.
That served to set back some of Rosie's gains for quite some time.
 

· Gold Bullet Member and Noted Curmudgeon
Joined
·
102,194 Posts
Lots of social issues related to this.
All the able bodied men were off doing their part and the women and unfit were left to face the monumental challenge.

Up til then, gals were regulated to having babies, homemaking and menial jobs.

They came out en masse and broke lots of stereotypes.
Womans rights and related issues advanced.

Sadly, at war's end, huge numbers got sent back to the kitchen sink and available developing emplyment was given to returning GIs.
That served to set back some of Rosie's gains for quite some time.
Most seem to have been willing enough to return to Kuchen, kinder und kirche, so to speak. And the social impact of NOT finding places for those returning GIs would have been - devastating. I have seen a Master's thesis written by a friend that concluded the GI Bill's main favorable impact on society and the economy was less the number of people who got college educations (though that sure played a considerable role in society and the skyriocket American economy post-war), but rather in smoothing the return to the labor pool by delaying entry for many of the folks who went to college instead of work. Helped prevent an immediate labor glut.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,634 Posts
I recall conversations I had in years gone by with some female relatives and other women and some accounts I read that many women were glad to get back to being a housewife. The work they performed was often tiring, gasoline rationing, shortages of tires, etc, meant that many had to either walk, take public transportation or car pool with all the aggravations that brought. Wartime shortages and rationing meant that there was often little to buy, waiting in lines, etc. Many women were de facto single mothers, that meant latch key kids and all the problems that caused, relying on a neighbor or a grandparent to watch them, etc.
Because it was a declared war and we had been attacked and our enemies were seen as particularly vicious and sinster-and evil-there was a sense of solidarity and national unity that neither World War I or even the Civil War generated. But from what I have gathered for many of them it was like Basic Training, OCS, Ranger School-or the Real Thing. They were there, they were proud to have done their part, but as far as repeating it-forget about it!
 

· Banned
Joined
·
5,142 Posts
People Family Grandparent
my mother and father on their 50th wedding aniversity in 1991, i think my brother and i would have been latch key children,except for my grandparents who we stayed with most of the week days that our mother worked while dad was away durning the war. i don,t remember much of it, but in the familey pictures my brother and i looked happy. and i was glad to see my dad at the end of the war. eastbank. Photograph People Snapshot Photography Black-and-white
 

· Diamond with Oak Clusters Bullet Member
Joined
·
105,354 Posts
Most seem to have been willing enough to return to Kuchen, kinder und kirche, so to speak. And the social impact of NOT finding places for those returning GIs would have been - devastating. I have seen a Master's thesis written by a friend that concluded the GI Bill's main favorable impact on society and the economy was less the number of people who got college educations (though that sure played a considerable role in society and the skyriocket American economy post-war), but rather in smoothing the return to the labor pool by delaying entry for many of the folks who went to college instead of work. Helped prevent an immediate labor glut.
I saw the same with the Korean war soldiers - a lot of them went to college. An unlike the rest of us, they were serious students.
 

· Gold Bullet Member and Noted Curmudgeon
Joined
·
102,194 Posts
I saw the same with the Korean war soldiers - a lot of them went to college. An unlike the rest of us, they were serious students.
I was a lot more serious about hitting the books and doing prep for classes in law school (on the GI Bill after i'd spent almost five years active duty and been to a war) than I was a few years earlier as an undergrad, yes.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,995 Posts
Most seem to have been willing enough to return to Kuchen, kinder und kirche, so to speak. And the social impact of NOT finding places for those returning GIs would have been - devastating. I have seen a Master's thesis written by a friend that concluded the GI Bill's main favorable impact on society and the economy was less the number of people who got college educations (though that sure played a considerable role in society and the skyriocket American economy post-war), but rather in smoothing the return to the labor pool by delaying entry for many of the folks who went to college instead of work. Helped prevent an immediate labor glut.
Speaking of highbrow essays, I wonder if you know of a comparative analysis of the GI Bill's impact on college tuition rates? I've read short blurbs here and there that basically stated there was direct correlation with increases of GI Bill funding and tuition hikes. Supposedly, tuition rates have increased over eight fold since the late 1980s, which was around the same time the DoD superseded the short lived VEAP program with the Montgomery GI Bill.

Sadly the military (at least the Chair Farce) have cut back on tuition assistance for Active Duty and have reinstated limitations for Jr. enlisted; whereas, Bungle proposes to increase civilian student loan aid whilst eliminating any future consequences for the lack of repayments.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
5,142 Posts
i think once you have been in a life and death struggle every day for months , you see things differently. things that were important before just don,t matter any more. and other things i just glanced over before and took for granted were looked on in a different light. over the years familey and close friends have become very importent to me and it saddens me greatly when they pass, i only have one brother and two sisters left now. eastbank.
 

· Gold Bullet Member and Noted Curmudgeon
Joined
·
102,194 Posts
Speaking of highbrow essays, I wonder if you know of a comparative analysis of the GI Bill's impact on college tuition rates? I've read short blurbs here and there that basically stated there was direct correlation with increases of GI Bill funding and tuition hikes. Supposedly, tuition rates have increased over eight fold since the late 1980s, which was around the same time the DoD superseded the short lived VEAP program with the Montgomery GI Bill.

Sadly the military (at least the Chair Farce) have cut back on tuition assistance for Active Duty and have reinstated limitations for Jr. enlisted; whereas, Bungle proposes to increase civilian student loan aid whilst eliminating any future consequences for the lack of repayments.
No, I am not aware of any such. Probably one exists, but i am not aware of it.

I expect there is, now that so many master's and doctoral theses are being put on-line, a dta base of subject/titles of such, but i can't say I now that, either but i expect a call to the enarest academic library wiuld help there.

I am pretty sure that any tuition incresaes since the 1980s has not been driven by GI Bill (of any sort) payments. And I know that (at least in Tejas) public institutions of higher education didn't run charges up much from 1945 until (at least) the mid-60s. When I started Texas A&M, a semester tuition as $50 and $1500 saw me through a year, for everything (tuition, books, lab fees, room & board, laundry, spendiug money - everything)....
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,000 Posts
There was a good PBS documentory on Rosie years ago.
Part focussed on some women who were not happy over lay offs.
Some had reached management level and were aware of woman's capabilities.
They had been denied opportunity overall up to this time.
There were plenty who wanted to stay out in the workforce and break the traditional chains.
Kind of sexist to think otherwise.

Motivation has a lot to do with scholastic success.
I partied away my deferment in 1966.
I got back in class in 1971 along with hordes of vets.
Couldn't live on the pittance and went to work.
Six years later I went back and finished while working full time.
Made only As and Bs and did well.
I did have to quit 1/2 way through a 36 hour grad program, but that's history.
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top