Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)


I recently purchased this unmodified Chatellerault Model 1892 (Berthier Carbine Model 1892). Some of the serial numbers do not match, but have heard this isn't uncommon. Hoping someone may shed some light on this carbine for me and what exactly the proof marks mean (see full list of questions below). Unfortunately I was only able to include 12 pictures, but if you would like to view additional pictures, I have an online album through Google at:

https://plus.google.com/photos/1089...s/5712035161950149121?authkey=CM-lqIiv2p3wjwE

I also have a video available on my youtube channel, you can watch video here:http://youtu.be/JnJ-DuIz0Is

Some of my main questions include:

1. What is the value of the gun in current condition?
2. Is this an un-modified original carbine from 1895?
3. If it hasn't been modified, does that make it more rare and collectible?
4. What does the proof marks mean on the left receiver (C -- C (circled) -- V (circled))?
5. What does some of the proof marks (besides the two "E's" and the "7") mean on the bottom of the barrel/receiver?
6. How many of these carbines were produced?
7. Has anyone successfully fired any Prvi Partizan out of their non-N marked rifles?
8. Was the bolt replaced?
9. What does the proof marks on the bolt mean ("S" inside a diamond and "31")?
10. Since the floorplate has a different serial number, can it still be verified that it was made at Chatellerault since the serial number is proceeded by a "B"?
11. Why would the stock not have a serial number?
12. What does the punch markings inside the stock mean (N 127)?

Any other information or history that can be provided on this gun?
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
Is this an un-modified original carbine from 1895 ? ... Actually NO ... the rear barrel band is not correct for this model as this was the type that was used on Carabine de Cavalerie Modèle 1890 2ème Type starting in 1894, not used on the Mousqueton d'Artillerie Modèle 1892. This model should have the one with a concentric ring mounted into it.
Also the stock is not correct either to be unmodified ... The original stock for these had a rotating swivel mounted on the underside of the stock, which this one was removed a filled in with wood. This one has a inletted notch was cut into the left side of the stock with a 6cm (2.36 inch) steel sling bar placed over it to retain the sling in place when in use which was first used on Carabine de Cavalerie Modèle 1890 2ème Type starting in 1894.
What the above tells me is that this weapon was re-built with a different stock and rear barrel band at some point in its life but well before the 1927 Modification Program.
to learn more please read this post ... http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php?86602-*-Berthier-Carbine-and-Rifle-Information-*

What does the proof marks mean on the left side of the barrel (C -- C (circled) -- V (circled)) ? ... the C is for who provided the steel for the barrel called the pourvoyeur de acier which was Companie des forges de Châtillon, Gemmentry and Menses-Maisons.
The first circled letter is that of the Supervising Officer called the Directeur de Manufacture of Manufacture Nationale d'Armes de Châtellerault in 1895 and that would be Chef d'Escadron Bonaventure, Joseph, François Camps.
The second circled letter is that of the Final Inspector/Principal Arms Controller called the Contrôleur Généraux Principaux of Manufacture Nationale d'Armes de Châtellerault in 1895 who was Louis Verdin.

What does some of the proof marks (besides the two "E's" and the "7") mean on the bottom of the barrel/receiver ? ... These are all the marks of the different 1st, 2nd and 3rd Class Controllers called Contrôleur de 1ème, 2ème y 3 ème Classe that were either in charge or worked at MAC who inspected the barrel for faults, proofing, etc. The two big E's with crowns that signify the weapons proofing called the Epreuve. The uppermost one is the primary proof of the steel and the other one is the final proof of the assembled weapon followed by a large number which told you the month that it was accomplished.

What does the proof marks on the bolt mean ("S" inside a diamond and "31") ? ... This is the mark of one of the different 1st, 2nd and 3rd Class Controllers called Contrôleur de 1ème, 2ème y 3 ème Classe. The bolt had definetely been replaced as that is why there is line through the older number, they put the new number to match.

Since the floorplate has a different serial number, can it still be verified that it was made at Chatellerault since the serial number is proceeded by a "B" ? ... Manufacture Nationale d'Armes de Châtellerault (MAC) used the letters A, B, C, D, E, so it was made by MAC.

How many of these carbines were produced ? ... It is estimated that approximately 300,000 of this particular weapon was made at MAS from 1892 to March of 1915 and 375,000 at MAC from 1892 to April of 1917.

One other thing is the chargers you have in your album are not for the Berthier but for Austro-Hungarian Mannlicher 1895 weapons, see the post I linked you to see which ones you will need.

Patrick
 

· Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Thanks Patrick for your quick reply with such great information!

Would you or anyone else still be able to answer some remaining questions:

1. What is the aproximate value of the gun in current condition?
2. Is the side sling mount instead of the lower sling mount the only difference between the two models of stocks?
3. Since the lower sling mount was filled in, could this have originally been a correct stock prior to a modification perhaps?
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
1. What is the approximate value of the gun in current condition ? ... This one I DO NOT answer at all, I have my reasons ... http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php?103504-Pricing-French-Weapons&highlight=pricing+weapons

2. Is the side sling mount instead of the lower sling mount the only difference between the two models of stocks ? ... Yes and No; This could have been an original stock that was modified to this configuration at one time or was a replacement stock which leads to the next question ...

3. Since the lower sling mount was filled in, could this have originally been a correct stock prior to a modification perhaps ? ... This answer is the stock itself, does the series letter prefix and number on the lower left side match that on the barrel ? or is it different ? Does it have a cartouche on the right side of the stock ? is it readable or not ?

Patrick
 

· Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Again, thanks for your quick response Patrick! I respect your reasons for not pricing firearms, totally understandable.

It sounds like from above, you are thinking the stock could be either a modified original or a replacement stock. In your #3 response (unfortunately I am a bit new to some of these historical and French terms), you are wondering if the stock has other identifying marks on it? The answer is, it does not - outside of the N 127 which is stamped on the inside.

I scoured this stock for other markings with a fine tooth comb early in my research as it seemed likely there would be something... Does the lack of markings or numbers mean something one way or another?

Located a French Model 1892 Bayonet, Second Pattern for this piece, will post pictures today or tomorrow.

Regards,
Ryan
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
On the lower left side of the outside of the stock there were a series prefix and numbers that would match the letter prefix and numbers on the left side on the barrel. This was how the stock was matched to the weapon.
On the lower right side of the outside of the stock was a circle with letters and numbers in then called a cartouche which basically told you when the weapon was accepted into French service.

Patrick
 

· Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Well unfortunately my rifle has none of those markings or numbers on the stock :(

Here are pics of the French Model 1892 Bayonet, Second Pattern I found for use with this carbine...

Would this be an appropriate bayonet for this firearm?
Is there any information that can be provided on this bayonet?

 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
To bad it does not have the letter prefix or numbers as that would tell us if it was original to the weapon ... Usually when there are no numbers or prefix letters present on the stock it is an indication of a replacement stock.

The bayonet is called the Sabre-Baïonnette Modèle 1892. This particular one is the the Troisième (3ème) Type (Third (3rd) Type, which we believe was adopted in service in September of 1918 according to one source, but as the information on this issue is scant at this time on this it could have well been adopted in 1915 when they removed the quillion on the Épée-Baïonnette Modèle 1886 which resulted in the Épée-Baïonnette Modèle 1886 Modifié 1915.

Patrick
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
There were two different barrel bands of this style ... one that fit without a handguard and one when they went to the Mousqueton d'Artillerie Modèle Modifié 1916 which had larger diameter barrel band was made to fit over the hand guard to keep it in place.
What you need to ask for is the measurement of it from the inside ... length, width and height
I would just keep the barrel band it has in place, it part of the history of the weapon :)

Patrick
 

· Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Hi Patrick, I am hoping you have experience with this and might be able to provide some insight, but was wondering if a hard bolt lift is typical with these rifles after dry firing? I disassembled and cleaned the bolt, but noticed it was hard to lift after test dry firing. Just not sure if something is not assembled correctly or perhaps if I just need some gun grease.

Also, still looking for what the "N 127" on the inside of the stock means? Any ideas?

As always, thanks!
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
Grease and oil the bolt will help :)
Make sure to lightly oil the firing pin and firing pin spring, I personally use grease on the spring, it makes them SLICK :)

I believe the N127 mark is a inspector mark, that is something that need to researched, we have a fantastic group of French collectors on this board who share thier knowledge on these weapons will know for sure :)

Patrick
 

· Silver Bullet Member
Joined
·
311 Posts
Grease and oil the bolt will help :)
Make sure to lightly oil the firing pin and firing pin spring, I personally use grease on the spring, it makes them SLICK :)
At the risk of hijacking this thread (and perhaps we can start a new thread/sticky instead) I'm wondering what grease you use, Patrick. I have some Automatenfett grease for my K31 (black/grey) so am tempted to try that. Other suggestions welcome, though, and thanks.
 

· Moderator / Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
8,263 Posts
I just use plain old good Hoppes Gun Grease.

Patrick
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,174 Posts
For the mobile parts grease is a better option than oil.

In the French Army, gun oil was used only fore cleaning the bore and as antirust coating of the steel part.
After cleaning/inspection the mobile parts were greased despite what is written in the various official rifle's user manuals.

The Swiss Army grease is excellent but since it is mixed with molykote, it has a tendancy to put black stains everywhere around the weapon.

kelt
 

· Registered
Joined
·
122 Posts
Hello Ryan,

You asked "If it hasn't been modified, does that make it more rare and collectible?":
Yes and no...
The interesting thing is that your stock is from a cavalry carbine Mle 1890. This stock was originally a mark 1 (1er type) stock as it was designed for the rotating swivel. In 1894 it was decided to change the fixation of the sling with a lateral barret and to fill the location of the rotating swivel with a wood plug. The rear barrel band with a ring was replaced too by the rear barrel band you have. The modified carbines were called "carabines de cavalerie du 2ème type" (Mark 2).
At the beginning of WW1 it became evident that horseback mounted troops were outdated and for the use in trenches it was necessary to fix a bayonet on the carbines.
During year 1915
cavalry carbines began to be converted to the Mousqueton d'Artillerie Modèle 1892 configuration. This conversion consisted of shortening the forend of the stock and fitting them with a bayonet lug.
The best thing to do would be to find a 1890 marked action and a Mle 1892 stock in order to make two different weapons: not so easy...
Let remain your weapon in his current state is a good option too...

Best regards,

Pierre


 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top