Joined
·
2,054 Posts
A Mount Prospect guy aka ZOZO or KITKAT did not do anything with this rifle. It is all correct, period.
Lc
Lc
Actually, nobody knows how and when these rifles came into US, there are very few of them in US and it is all factory original. Stocks are original and had serial numbers added vertically probably by whatever country military requirements.Rifle was imported into Canada in the 80s or 90s (my guess is out of Yugoslavia) and wandered into the US sometime later. Parts appear to be original to the gun but stock is sanded, refinished, and renumbered. Some of these have the metal refinished as well, but it is hard to tell from the pics. All of these are 43 dated AVT and most have the original factory metal parts (not all!) and some even have their original stocks though all of them will be renumbered vertically.
Price is absurd. I paid less for my untouched vet bringback.
All bolts were blued after late 1941.
If it was rebuilt rifle- the stock would have an arsenal repair like this arsenal rebuilt import marked rifle advertised as "historical artifact":You sound biased. To me the rifle sold for to much and was falsely advertised. The title claimed that is was a "non rebuilt" and it clearly has had some things done to the stock, like on this import marked refurb:
And it looks to me like the stock has a large crack in it on the left side.
The only thing on this rifle that was not when it left the factory is the crack in the stock. But what exactly was rebuilt?How is my owning many of these rifles relevant to this rifle being worked on post war? How many I own has nothing to do with weather this rifle has had something done to it post war by either a collector or an army. That is a silly question, which by the way I do own a matching rifle that is not rebuilt or import marked, matching even includes the magazine. How many of those have you seen? So can I get $4000 for my rifle? The point I am making is that the seller was a little misleading with his title. I am not saying he did it on purpose but that does change the fact that his rifle is not the way it was when it left the factory in 1943, therefore it has been rebuilt to some extent. Now that said, he took pictures and people knew what they were buying. I am not complaining, just commenting on the fact that I think it was a little to high. But perhaps you are correct and these rifles are increasing in price.
There is a thread on 1943 rifles on this Forum which ends with my polite request to anybody to post pictures of what is all original 1943 SVT-Gorilka claimed he had one- still waiting for the pictures for a long time now.There have been numerous postings of original 43/44 rifles from Ukrainian and Russian collections including the photos Ratnik just reposted. You are simply choosing to live in denial.
I meant to write: "so-called bring backs"!!!!!
Bring-backs were brought back, hence the name.
Slim Tim,Sorry to start something and not get back to it, I don't get much forum time these days. Lenscrafter, are you the seller in this auction?
SlimTim