Joined
·
722 Posts
Picked this up and wanted to share as well as to pick forum members' brains on this. What we have is a nice 1942 Enfield No 2 Mk 1* revolver along with a South African marked open top holster and lanyard. The non-import marked Enfield is interesting in that it doesn't have any of the typical NP proof marks which would indicate that it was sold through the British commercial market. For me personally, this is somewhat scarce as these guns typically have those commercial proofs. The revolver has original finish so it isn't like the proofs were buffed out or covered up in a repark job.
It is housed in an open-top holster with the "U/broadarrow" 1943 marking indicating South African ownership. The pistol itself has no Commonwealth ownership proofs. It also has an interesting lanyard which has the characteristics of the typical British lanyard, but is made from a simpler material. I am wondering whether this might be S. African made as well? It seems like the Commonwealth countries, who generally didn't have the same manufacturing capacity as the UK, copied their gear on the British patterns but the actual gear was of a simpler quality, which makes me think this might be SA made. The brass cleaning rod is pretty firmly stuck in the holster and I don't want to risk damaging the leather to pull it out. From what I can see, it is a legit British brass rod.
The Enfield is in the Q-block serial range and sports the wooden grips without the marking disc feature. I think that per Skinnerton's book, these were correct for the Q-R block guns. Anyway, I am interested in adding to my existing knowledge on these and appreciate any input others might have.
It is housed in an open-top holster with the "U/broadarrow" 1943 marking indicating South African ownership. The pistol itself has no Commonwealth ownership proofs. It also has an interesting lanyard which has the characteristics of the typical British lanyard, but is made from a simpler material. I am wondering whether this might be S. African made as well? It seems like the Commonwealth countries, who generally didn't have the same manufacturing capacity as the UK, copied their gear on the British patterns but the actual gear was of a simpler quality, which makes me think this might be SA made. The brass cleaning rod is pretty firmly stuck in the holster and I don't want to risk damaging the leather to pull it out. From what I can see, it is a legit British brass rod.
The Enfield is in the Q-block serial range and sports the wooden grips without the marking disc feature. I think that per Skinnerton's book, these were correct for the Q-R block guns. Anyway, I am interested in adding to my existing knowledge on these and appreciate any input others might have.