Gunboards Forums banner

M1 Garand help!

544 Views 12 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  RS
9
I’ve posted this on some Facebook groups, but nothing 100% yet. Looks like a pretty obvious fakery. I’m just trying to see if anyone has any info on what is going on with these markings. For example, there is 11-SA-8 under the rear handguard. Can’t make sense of that. There’s a 30-06 stamp that I don’t recognize. Is this a criterion barrel? Maybe citadel? There are no import marks. Just trying to figure out something more than just “it doesn’t look right”.

thanks!

Attachments

See less See more
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
I am not absolutely sure, but that .30/06 kerfuffle is an import mark, slightly obscured and partly mis-stamped. I've seen some other sloppily stamped WW2 barrels which turned out to be genuine. The topside lot number appears to be fine, but the date/maker data is all messed up. I doubt if it's aftermarket, but it may be a "gray" barrel someone re-marked. More likely, but also not CERTAIN: That was during the height of that first summer after Pearl Harbor. Lots of panicky product and details let to slip and corrected later. I'm inclined to think it was hand punched because the original hollow cut die missed the mark or didn't imprint properly. So I'd say there's a strong chance it's an original.

Were it a Criterion, there'd be tracks of someone removing their markings. Citadels are usually finished very light gray from the early period, inky black after about 1999. Their crowns tended to be "flattish".

However, snobbery to the contrary, guys were milling and turning Garand barrels a long time ago, and most--from the factories or done in workshops!--originally bore no markings at all.

Another note: factory M1's VERY RARELY featured "matched" finish and color/tone. That's almost entirely a myth on military rifles, but especially so on Garands. The blackish phosphate finish on your receiver is either original or a careful refinish. But if it's all matched, from this period, and especially from the armory, it's very likely someone wanted to fool novices and it's refinished for "cosmetic" (fakery) purposes. I do not think this rifle falls into that category.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
9
I am not absolutely sure, but that .30/06 kerfuffle is an import mark, slightly obscured and partly mis-stamped. I've seen some other sloppily stamped WW2 barrels which turned out to be genuine. The topside lot number appears to be fine, but the date/maker data is all messed up. I doubt if it's aftermarket, but it may be a "gray" barrel someone re-marked. More likely, but also not CERTAIN: That was during the height of that first summer after Pearl Harbor. Lots of panicky product and details let to slip and corrected later. I'm inclined to think it was hand punched because the original hollow cut die missed the mark or didn't imprint properly. So I'd say there's a strong chance it's an original.

Were it a Criterion, there'd be tracks of someone removing their markings. Citadels are usually finished very light gray from the early period, inky black after about 1999. Their crowns tended to be "flattish".

However, snobbery to the contrary, guys were milling and turning Garand barrels a long time ago, and most--from the factories or done in workshops!--originally bore no markings at all.

Another note: factory M1's VERY RARELY featured "matched" finish and color/tone. That's almost entirely a myth on military rifles, but especially so on Garands. The blackish phosphate finish on your receiver is either original or a careful refinish. But if it's all matched, from this period, and especially from the armory, it's very likely someone wanted to fool novices and it's refinished for "cosmetic" (fakery) purposes. I do not think this rifle falls into that category.
Here are a few pictures I took outside, just in case in clarifies anything. Great information! The stock is a replacement, which I knew when I bought it.

Attachments

See less See more
2
Here are a few pictures I took outside, just in case in clarifies anything. Great information! The stock is a replacement, which I knew when I bought it.
US military barrels for the M1 rifle are not marked 30-06, the drawing number on the top of the barrel will have
a revision number. The date (your receiver) will be upside down and start with S-A then the barrel date.

my photos show a June 1940 barrel for reference of the markings

Attachments

See less See more
US military barrels for the M1 rifle are not marked 30-06, the drawing number on the top of the barrel will have
a revision number. The date (your receiver) will be upside down and start with S-A then the barrel date.

my photos show a June 1940 barrel for reference of the markings
first photo not showing will try again

Attachments

See less See more
I was of the same mind as Mr. Thompson - it was an import. Some imports are stamped with the caliber of it is not somewhere else on the gun.

I sure could be wrong, it’s just the first thing that came to mind when I saw your pic.
You can overlook the fake date and drawing number on this barrel, I just posted an original example
Anyone else notice the single slot gas screw? Doesnt the hole look to large like a reproduction ?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Anyone else notice the single slot gas screw? Doesnt the hole look to large like a reproduction ?
It’s definitely a repro. Here an original for comparison.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
See less See more
I was of the same mind as Mr. Thompson - it was an import. Some imports are stamped with the caliber of it is not somewhere else on the gun.

I sure could be wrong, it’s just the first thing that came to mind when I saw your pic.
You can not overlook the fake date and drawing number on this barrel, I just posted an original example
Appreciate everyone’s thoughts. My plan all along has been to return this gun. Too many questions and red flags. Just thought it would be a good learning experience to see what others thought about it.
Also: Most of the genuine gas cylinder lock screws were finished very dark, almost true black.

This is not the most questionable rifle I've seen. It's almost as if someone wanted a very nice visual restoration, using a few repro or "iffy" parts. Indeed, I have a feeling I've seen that rifle before...
3
Also: Most of the genuine gas cylinder lock screws were finished very dark, almost true black.

This is not the most questionable rifle I've seen. It's almost as if someone wanted a very nice visual restoration, using a few repro or "iffy" parts. Indeed, I have a feeling I've seen that rifle before...
I have some photos of some gas cylinder lock screws. some are Winchester and the rest Springfield. Also note the taper
where the threads start was authorized in July 1941. These are original lock screws

Attachments

See less See more
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top