I pity any young innocent and naive new comers coming in to this forum who might be dumb enough to believe GunnerSams brilliant personal theories on the Enfield rifle.
Nothing theoretical about it, as your own posted treatise on ammunition confirmed if you'd have bothered to read it, rather than just glancing over the pages while scanning them. You really should read the Encylopedia of Science and technology entries I linked to, and the Dictionary of applied Chemistry entries you also choose to ignore.
Go ahead and ignore the condition of rifle bores if you like, an eye patch will give you a piratical air.
The key to reading the Treatise on Ammunition I posted is looking at the date it was published: 1915 and Mk.I Cordite now go back to the cordite posting and eat crow
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Gunboards Forums
5.7M posts
131.6K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to all firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, makes, models, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!