Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 20 of 28 Posts

· Moderator/Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
9,328 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Quick question for you guys:
Are your receivers 1940 Tula stamped? If not, are they 1940 Izhevsk stamped? Here's what I'm getting at...If a decent number are Izhevsk marked, it might fill out the story of the '41 Tula 91/30s a bit. For example, it would be interesting to know if the slowdown in Tula 91/30 production began earlier, in favor of SVTs, Maxims, Nagant revolvers, etc. that we already know about.

Thanks in advance for your input-
Pat
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,005 Posts
Poot:

Two 'star 40's, both Finn fiddles, but one with all of the parts star marked and numbers matching, in an Ishevsk dragoon stock. The other is a shotout eclecticism.

Of more conjecture than substance, quite some time ago we had one that a customer attempted to return because the receiver was marked '40' and the barrel was marked 1941. At the time I had no idea that Mosins could be any more than table/rack litter, so they were all priced the same, with slight consideration as to matching numbers or condition. I thought that the receiver date was a red herring because what he tried to return had been 'parts-pirated'. So the question might be, "are there other such rifles and what is the frequence of their occurrance"?
 

· Moderator/Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
9,328 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Thanks, gentlemen.

It's not a big enough sample, but so far it sounds like the change over happened in 1941 and not earlier. My current best guess is that the '41 Tulas were made up of originally 1940 dated barrels (hence the odd looking final digit) mated up with Izhevsk receivers and getting final assembly at Izhevsk.

Pat
 

· Diamond w/Oak Clusters and Swords Bullet Member
None of your business.
Joined
·
17,534 Posts
I have one Tula 1940 dated barrel, receiver, and stock. DDR marked.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,810 Posts
Thanks, gentlemen.

It's not a big enough sample, but so far it sounds like the change over happened in 1941 and not earlier. My current best guess is that the '41 Tulas were made up of originally 1940 dated barrels (hence the odd looking final digit) mated up with Izhevsk receivers and getting final assembly at Izhevsk.

Pat
Sounds like the best explanation to me.
 

· Silver Bullet Member
Joined
·
1,412 Posts
my one M91/30 Tula 1940 has a star and 40 on the tang.
Same with mine as well. My '42 Tula has a '42 and star on its tang. Wish I could say I had a '41.
 

· Moderator/Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
9,328 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
It's almost like this happened with the beginning of the year 1941. Again, the reported results form WAY too small a sample, but I think a suggestion of the trend can be gleaned from this.

Thanks again for your time-
Pat
 

· Gold Bullet member
Joined
·
2,935 Posts
My 1940 has a '40 Tula receiver. My 1941 Tula has an Izhevsk receiver.

My best guess is that Tula stopped making 91/30s in late 1940 and made none at all in 1941. As far as I know, there have been not one '41 Tula found with a '41 Tula receiver, or having the same font in the last digit on the date. Most have '194' the same font, and the '1' is either over stamped on a '0', or else just a different font. I think Tula was probably ordered to concentrate on other weapons like the SVT40 in that year, since '41 Tula SVT40s or 1895 Nagant pistols are not uncommon. When war came in mid 1941, they assembled what they had, but who knows where the 1941 Tulas were actually assembled.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top