Interesting scabbard, it could be legitimate.
Ah, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?A foole and his money be soone at debate, which after with sorow repents him too late.
IMO, the wrapping is too haphazard, and irregular for Japanese work. Even field expedient repairs, and additions are always neat, and purposly done. I suspect Bubba.Ah, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?
A lesson of why helps me a lot more than a quote from 1587
Note the gundersonmilitaria example has been listed for about a year for less money. I have a metal one similarly wrapped, but take it as a GI/Sailor done example. Note the lacquer on the bayonet handle and the off colors on the string on that one.Gundersonmilitaria has this one for $325.... http://www.gundersonmilitaria.com/japbayonetarisakatoyodawoodscab12214.jpg
Mr. TinkerAh, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?
A lesson of why helps me a lot more than a quote from 1587
What was his opinion?Note the gundersonmilitaria example has been listed for about a year for less money. I have a metal one similarly wrapped, but take it as a GI/Sailor done example. Note the lacquer on the bayonet handle and the off colors on the string on that one.
There are numerous wrapped metal scabbard examples, but the only commonly seen (if less than a dozen is common) wrapped wood scabbard examples have a cloth cover. The winner sent a note stating his opinion on the piece and he is happy with the purchase. I was just was just curious of opinions.