Gunboards Forums banner

Did you win this Bayonet?

1689 Views 12 Replies 9 Participants Last post by  Jareth
Gentlemen,

I know several of you are serious Bayonet collectors. Did anyone win this odd Japanese late war bayonet? The bayonet is a relatively hard to find variation (LB 146, rounded button), but the scabbard appeared to be a fantasy piece.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180480330951

The frog is similar to a LBF-55 (I’ve got an example), but that’s where any similarities to known examples stop. I have several cloth covered scabbards, but the only string wrapped scabbards I’ve seen were post war or done by a returning service member.

Note that an LBS 25, 29, and 30 are all late war scabbards, but only wrapped enough to keep them operational. The example of the LBF-44 I have is on a normal late war wood scabbard. To go through this much effort is doubtful based on known examples. This bayonet was at the SOS, but no one considered it right. Did anyone win it and decide otherwise? Are other example out there?
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
A foole and his money be soone at debate, which after with sorow repents him too late.
A foole and his money be soone at debate, which after with sorow repents him too late.
Ah, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?

A lesson of why helps me a lot more than a quote from 1587
Ah, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?

A lesson of why helps me a lot more than a quote from 1587
IMO, the wrapping is too haphazard, and irregular for Japanese work. Even field expedient repairs, and additions are always neat, and purposly done. I suspect Bubba.
Note the gundersonmilitaria example has been listed for about a year for less money. I have a metal one similarly wrapped, but take it as a GI/Sailor done example. Note the lacquer on the bayonet handle and the off colors on the string on that one.

There are numerous wrapped metal scabbard examples, but the only commonly seen (if less than a dozen is common) wrapped wood scabbard examples have a cloth cover. The winner sent a note stating his opinion on the piece and he is happy with the purchase. I was just was just curious of opinions.
6
Ah, sage advice, now please tell us "why" it is incorrect?

A lesson of why helps me a lot more than a quote from 1587
Mr. Tinker

My apologies if you were the purchaser of this bayonet, unfortunately I am a cynic, if you? are happy, it was a good deal.

As to the 1587 comment here is a more recent demonstration, mid 1945 or so.

The photos are of a Vet purchased series 111 serial 14574 bayonet and scabbard predating your? series 111 bayonet by 39334 bayonets. Note 14574 is a late war substitute scabbard, no frills, tin throat and tip and only one 5 strand twine wrap mid span of scabbard instead of the earlier double, 10 to 12 strand twine wrap.

Japanese manufacturing being strangled by materials shortage to the point of using only 5 strands of twine. Then your? serial 53908 is made using more (brand new looking?) (jute?) twine than a hundred scabbards would take, must have been the holiday sake party at the factory.

An observation, serial 53908 appears to be unissued both bayonet and scabbard, the small amount of visible wood at the throat appears new or at least recent, 65 years turns wood dark, field used or not.

Caveat Emptor

Attachments

See less See more
By the handle of Juken30 and the educational post(s) I can comfortably say "Welcome aboard Bill"! :thumbsup:
Note the gundersonmilitaria example has been listed for about a year for less money. I have a metal one similarly wrapped, but take it as a GI/Sailor done example. Note the lacquer on the bayonet handle and the off colors on the string on that one.

There are numerous wrapped metal scabbard examples, but the only commonly seen (if less than a dozen is common) wrapped wood scabbard examples have a cloth cover. The winner sent a note stating his opinion on the piece and he is happy with the purchase. I was just was just curious of opinions.
What was his opinion?
Having handled the bayonet & scabbard in question I can clarify the following 1) wood at throat is oxidized. Pulling back top few rows of string showed this clearly 2) tip was nicely patinated copper & was held on by a single nail. Interesting that nail head has same waffled pattern as found on late type 99 wood butt plates 3) not shown in the photos was the aging on the twine & high spots that exibited soiling etc. 4) another interesting detail was the rare frog incorporated in the wrapping. As for bayonets scabbards placement within a particular series used to demonstrate "correct" scabbard type numerous anomolies occured. For example unpainted bamboo scabbards, crude steel scabbards etc. To say with any certainty which scabbard is appropriate for what series is going out on a personal limb. TALW have more scabbard variations then any other arsenal. Other arsenals used metal wire to wrap their scabbards. In collecting Japanese military odd things (2nd series type 99 with no arsenal mark etc) are constantly turning up & making us rethink the known givens.
See less See more
Jareth,
OK, but why wind the scabbard with yards of twine? Way over kill for any reasonable use, JMHO.
regadless of when it was done why wrap the scabbard with so much twine. No stoner would especially with that frog. It also isn't macrame/sailor art so I don't know. There was a pattern in the wrap system. It was well thought out & not haphazard.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top