[MauserboyM48]

MB,
You seem to defend libreal democrats, and dislike republicans, why do you have a republican candidate on your sig?

Because I don't tie my allegiance to a particular party, but towards the Constitution and traditional Conservative American values. Remember, the Democratic party used to be considered "conservative".

Yes, there very well maybe democrats who are traitors. But that doesn't mean you should generalize someone because of the letter next to their name, whether it would be D or R. Bush is a Republican but his actions are not in step with the traditional views and actions of the Republican party.

 

[ret_marine2003]

Because I don't tie my allegiance to a particular party, but towards the Constitution and traditional Conservative American values. Remember, the Democratic party used to be considered "conservative".

Yes, there very well maybe democrats who are traitors. But that doesn't mean you should generalize someone because of the letter next to their name, whether it would be D or R. Bush is a Republican but his actions are not in step with the traditional views and actions of the Republican party.

You are at a constant loss of credibility.

Not only because all of your opinions and views of history require the full benefit of hindsight with a dash of rewriting history and an extra helping of taking it out of context to make it palatable, but because you write and likely think like a schizophrenic.

I suspect that may be because you are trying hard to make people believe that you believe in things you have already displayed that you clearly do not believe in.

You go from posting angry socialist crap to trying to pretend you care about "Constitutional or conservative values".

This is nothing more than written double talk.



Perhaps as you have posted; "You are just letting your blind faith in a broken ideology lead you to conclusions that are incorrect."

 

[IBBG]

Given their track record, I think "traitors" sums it up nicely. I think "stupid" really applies better to the folks that continue to re-elect them.

 

[MauserboyM48]

You are at a constant loss of credibility.

Not only because all of your opinions and views of history require the full benefit of hindsight with a dash of rewriting history and an extra helping of taking it out of context to make it palatable, but because you write and likely think like a schizophrenic.

I suspect that may be because you are trying hard to make people believe that you believe in things you have already displayed that you clearly do not believe in.

You go from posting angry socialist crap to trying to pretend you care about "Constitutional or conservative values".

This is nothing more than written double talk.



Perhaps as you have posted; "You are just letting your blind faith in a broken ideology lead you to conclusions that are incorrect."

Please show me where I posted "socliast crap."

You won't find it, because I never said it. Quite frankly sir, I think you're a bumbling idiot that won't debate me because you are unable to. You don't have a good argument besides "TRAITOR LOL, SOCIALIST, LOL, COMMIE, LOL, YOU HATE AMERICA BECAUSE YOU WANT THE TROOPS TO LEAVE, LOL,"
Please, try forming your own opinions rather than regurgitating the same mindless sh*t the bush people send out.

 

[ret_marine2003]

You need to read your own posts to answer your own questions.

Then get back to me later by PM with an apology for wasting my time.

While you are at it you can return to this forum and appoligise for wasting everyone else's time with your poorly researched and moronic blurbs.

 

[MauserboyM48]

You need to read your own posts to answer your own questions.

Then get back to me later by PM with an apology for wasting my time.

While you are at it you can return to this forum and appoligise for wasting everyone else's time with your poorly researched and moronic blurbs.

I have better things to do than entertain an ignorant and hopeless little Chimp like you.

Because you can't debate facts. You've let the talking heads brainwash you and you are believing in a failed ideology, probably to the bitter end. Furher syndrome is what you have, "No matter what it takes as long as it takes...victory or death...anyone who disagrees is a defeatist and traitor.."

You haven't even attempted to even discuss the topic at hand, just "traitors" is all we get out of you. Apparently thats what the neo-con base has for brains today, mush. Pure mush. Nothing that can process or form opinions, just the same mantra we've been hearing from the ones in charge. You are the liberal if you support this war, you are the liberal if you support this President. This President is in no way shape or form the definition of conservative. You exemplify this material:
NSFW!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oboyox3L_MI

and this material: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u00Q8jqliI

 

[ret_marine2003]

You need to read your own posts to answer your own questions.

Then get back to me later by PM with an apology for wasting my time.

While you are at it you can return to this forum and appoligise for wasting everyone else's time with your poorly researched and moronic blurbs.

I have better things to do than entertain an ignorant and hopeless little Chimp like you.

You continue to repeat the same few words and phrases you have repeated since the beginning.

You are not debating anyone.

You are not even remotely qualified to debate with anyone here.

The only variation you show is the weak insults you try to hurl at those who disagree with you.

Then you accuse others of being brain washed?

Try reading your own crap and see how completely ridiculous you are.

 

[ret_marine2003]

You are at a constant loss of credibility.

Not only because all of your opinions and views of history require the full benefit of hindsight with a dash of rewriting history and an extra helping of taking it out of context to make it palatable, but because you write and likely think like a schizophrenic.

I suspect that may be because you are trying hard to make people believe that you believe in things you have already displayed that you clearly do not believe in.

You go from posting angry socialist crap to trying to pretend you care about "Constitutional or conservative values".

This is nothing more than written double talk.

Perhaps as you have posted; "You are just letting your blind faith in a broken ideology lead you to conclusions that are incorrect."

Repeat for emphasis.

 

[MauserboyM48]

You continue to repeat the same few words and phrases you have repeated since the beginning.

You are not debating anyone.

You are not even remotely qualified to debate with anyone here.

The only variation you show is the weak insults you try to hurl at those who disagree with you.

Then you accuse others of being brain washed?

Try reading your own crap and see how completely ridiculous you are.

Weak insults? So you don't think calling those that oppose the war "traitors" isn't an insult?
Check yourself before you call others out.

 

[ret_marine2003]

I like pancakes.

 

[rickyracer2]

Yup! Stupid!

 

[Irgun]

Read Ann Coulter's book "Treason" and you will conclude, as i, they are traitorous.

And maybe a little stoopid.

 

[ret_marine2003]

Read Ann Coulter's book "Treason" and you will conclude, as i, they are traitorous.

And maybe a little stoopid.

Read some of the half baked schemes our leftists cook up and advocate for, judge them with common sense.

When these fools talk about appeasing radical museums, read what the radicals have to say.

When they talk about "common sense gun legislation" always ask for their definition of common sense. If they can not provide one let their past experiences show you their definition.

When they vote against their values "for principle" know that they have no values or real principals.

 

[MauserboyM48]

Read some of the half baked schemes our leftists cook up and advocate for, judge them with common sense.

When these fools talk about appeasing radical museums, read what the radicals have to say.

When they talk about "common sense gun legislation" always ask for their definition of common sense. If they can not provide one let their past experiences show you their definition.

When they vote against their values "for principle" know that they have no values or real principals.

Yet just like you, they endorse the welfare-warfare state. So there really isn't much difference between you and your democrat friends.

 

[ret_marine2003]

Yet just like you, they endorse the welfare-warfare state. So there really isn't much difference between you and your democrat friends.

I think you are "projecting" here.

This is one of your typical low functioning douche bag ploys to distract us from the fact that you don't have a clue, a real opinion, or a purpose in life.

I learn more about you from the questions you refuse to answer and dance around.

Red boot laces or white Mouser BOY, which is it?

 

[MauserboyM48]

I think you are "projecting" here.

This is one of your typical low functioning douche bag ploys to distract us from the fact that you don't have a clue, a real opinion, or a purpose in life.

I learn more about you from the questions you refuse to answer and dance around.

Oh dear....who let ret_marine out of the mental institution again??

 

[AzCetme]

I like pancakes.

Mmmmmmmm pancakes sound really good right about now.

 

[jjk308 In Memoriam RIP]

WAFFLES!

WAFFLE HOUSE WAFFLES!

Do they really put cocaine in them? I'm addicted.

 

[wesleyan-gun]

Democrats to Save the Nation?

Well, I cannot agree with your thesis. Many fine Demos serve in government and their perception of reality differs from the Bush administration (which is another topic altogether). I think they are concerned with the budget deficit, declining value of the dollar, energy security and national health care (a soon-to-be reality whether anyone likes it or not since the "free" market has not shown it can be the provider of cost effective health care).
I also think or hope they will redress some the statutory issues which favor big business over the working person and begin to prosecute contractors in Iraq who are ripping off the government. Dems seem to be the major party interested in these things since many Republicans seem to be headed to jail.

 

[Clyde]

Oh my, weasely anne is back. What is happening in West Mill Creek, do you suppose?