Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
3,553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/18550/

Glenn Beck: Goodbye $700 billion...hello $7.4 trillion!
November 24, 2008 - 12:50 ET

GLENN: The Drudge Report has Panic of '08. This story changes everything. This story is the story that you -- if this doesn't open your eyes, nothing will. This is the story that you need to send to all of your friends, anyone who has said to you, why are you -- oh, stop panicking; we've been through this before; oh, it's no big deal. This story will prove them wrong and if they don't get it on this story, they never, ever will. Most Americans will not get it even now. You will. Panic of '08, here's the headline in red on the front page of Drudge. The U.S. Government is prepared to lend more than $7.4 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers. That is half the value of everything produced in the United States last year. Let me repeat. The U.S. Government is prepared to lend more than $7.4 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers. That is half the value of everything produced in our nation last year. They are doing it to, quote, rescue the financial system since the credit markets seized up 15 months ago. The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $2.8 trillion already tapped by the financial institutions.

Remember I said about four weeks ago it's not $700, stop saying $700 billion, stop focusing on that; that number is $3 trillion? That comes from my researchers just trying to paste things together, just trying to figure out what they've actually done. We came up with a number of $3 trillion. Now Bloomberg reports it's $2.8 trillion. Quite honestly I'd count on our numbers. This dwarves that approved by lawmakers, the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Key phrase: The equipment of $7.4 trillion dwarves the only plan approved by lawmakers, The Treasury Department's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program which, by the way, they decided they weren't going to do. The only thing that our representatives agreed to do, they didn't do. The price tag for what we agreed to do was $700 billion. They have just spent $2.8 trillion and today they have agreed to $7.4 trillion. The Federal Reserve's lending last week, tell me that there's a problem with lending in this country. The Federal Reserve's lending, they lend to banks, was 1900 times the weekly average for three years before the crisis.

Okay, so what does all of this mean? I am no longer going to even listen to anybody who says to me, "Oh, that's crazy; that will never happen." I have been saying these things for two years. I've been talking about the perfect storm for five years. It has come to shore and everyone has said to me, and even I have said on the air, "You're right, it is crazy; I hope these things don't happen." I have had dinner after dinner, I've had meeting after meeting, I've had conversations on and off the air with some of the greatest minds around today and they have all said the same thing: Glenn, well, so many things have to happen. And I said no, the only thing that has to happen is people have to continue to be blind. The people who set this up are the people -- and I don't mean set it up like it's a Star Chamber. The people who designed this financial system are arrogant. They keep saying, "Well, this will never happen, well, that's where we have this valve and this valve." If you use the common sense of a self-educated guy, of a farmer, of a guy who just runs his household, if we use the common sense that you have, if you stop looking at the global economy like magic and you start looking at it just like a macro version of your house, you will understand it won't work! No matter how many things that you do, how many tricks you try, no matter what you name things and how many acronyms you give things so people can't understand it, it still boils down to, it doesn't work.

So I have to ask anyone who's within the sound of my voice. I have said to you, please prepare, and the biggest problem with it is people will say, "Oh, he's just doom and gloom. Oh, he's just, he's crazy. Oh, those things aren't going to happen." And I said to you, Stu, how many -- I said four months ago and you said it was a lot longer than that. Do you remember how many months ago? It was six months ago, a year ago? Somebody can look it up. I said the Dow is going to be at 7500. People said to me at the time, "That's crazy, Glenn." I think at the time I said it was at 13,000. "That's crazy. Do you know what it would do to the economy?" I said, "Yes, you're missing the point. Yes, I do understand. I know what that means." Well, we hit 7500 last week. We're going to hit 5,000, not because of anything else other than this system is not going to stand. We're not allowing the purge of the system. We're propping up -- we haven't learned our lesson from the Nineties and the dot-com bubble. You are creating a money bubble. First it was the dot-com bubble. It popped because it wasn't real. And to save the dot-com bubble and to save us from all of that pain of what that would cost, what we did is we created another bubble. By pumping more money in, making it easier to get loans, we pumped another, more money into it and people went out and they bought stuff. So we created a housing bubble and a credit bubble. Well, now that that has popped, what are we doing? We're creating another bubble but, gang, it's the last bubble. It is the money bubble. We are pumping money into the system.

Now, they will tell you that $7.4 trillion, that's just pledged money, that's just to give people confidence. Understand that we were at the top -- do you remember two years ago, three years ago, five years ago I was trying to get a hold of David Walker to find out about the actual national debt and how on the edge we are on the national debt? That's when we knew at the time we had $7 trillion in debt and at the time I think $45 trillion on Social Security and Medicare. We've added to that. Now we have a $10 trillion debt, and the same people that told us the debt is going to kill us, the debt, we've got -- we can't fight this war, we can't afford these things, look at the debt, the debt, the debt, are the same people, both Republican and Democrat now that are telling us the debt doesn't matter. The debt matters! The debt matters in your house. Stop looking at it as magic tricks.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,268 Posts
i was just talking with my wife last night about how paulson's NEW plan to stimulate lending and UNLOCK the FROZEN credit market made NO SENSE and really NONE of the things these fools have been doing make ANY SENSE AT ALL..to me. she said the SAME thing. it makes no sense.
 

· Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
36,347 Posts
Another economic expert heard from whose "expertise" is limited to parroting back whatever was said by the latest jabbering fool who caught his attention.

I've decided to name it "The Mauserboy Effect". Endless words on a subject completely impenetrable to the brain of the writer.

Of course the supposedly real, honest to God economic experts on the Obama team helped create the mess we're in now. Glenn Beck just yapped on the radio and TV and therefore didn't do any damage to the American economy except to scare some folks into hoarding food and ammo.

I'm beginning to get the feeling that I'd get just as good advice by asking my cats about the economy. At least their blank stares are honest.

I suggest you do some analysis of what people like Glenn Beck are saying. They seem to want an austerity program, debt drawdown and elimination public and private. Usually that's the way to cut drastic inflation and we now have deflation. The last time an austerity program was tried in the USA in a deflationary environment was in the Hoover administration, and FDR's New Deal is now believed to have failed because he kept the Hoover austerity program while tacking public works, much higher taxes and some more welfare on top of it.
 

· Silver Bullet Member an all around excellent guy
Joined
·
49,992 Posts
None of this makes any sense to me either, but it does worry me to no end.

One of my many duties as "man of the house" is to keep a roof over my family's head and food on the table. In fact, its my primary responsibility. Fail at these duties and everything else is academic. I don't need a bass boat, another firearm, a vacation, or even new underwear. Just please allow me the courtesy of earning enough (and keeping enough Mr. Taxman) to provide for my family.

I hope God steps in and starts giving our elected leaders some foresight and wisdom for a change because I'm worried they are doing things are running contrary to my ability to provide for my family in the short and long term.
 

· Silver Bullet member
Joined
·
36,347 Posts
View attachment 126970 jjk308: so.. old wise one.. the fed printing money 24/7 is o.k. with you?
You just proved my point.

Now please explain how you can mitigate the effect of a market panic, the disappearance of many trillions of dollars of securities values and credit, without replacing some of the money lost?

Please tell us clearly and exactly. All those Obama financial experts are waiting to hear your new and magical alternate way out of this mess that wont plunge the economy into an orgy of devaluation and unemployment.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,961 Posts
It may be a pledge, but is it pledged money, even, unless they have a commitment from the Democrat party to pay it?
The Dems will probably buy off on it, stupid as they are. We actually had a good sound banking system until the deregulation fanatics like Phil Gramm (Republican-Texas, naturally) began to tear down the regulatory system. We need a return to good, sound banking practices and a ban on derivatives-based investment schemes to stop the corporate looting of the public treasury. The cost of subsidizing the big business sector is literally unbelievable, but was caused and is exacerbated by the Bush regime.

Good to hear your voice on our forum Calgacus. Our European friends are always welcome.
 

· Diamond Bullet Member
Joined
·
10,387 Posts
The Dems will probably buy off on it, stupid as they are. We actually had a good sound banking system until the deregulation fanatics like Phil Gramm (Republican-Texas, naturally) began to tear down the regulatory system. We need a return to good, sound banking practices and a ban on derivatives-based investment schemes to stop the corporate looting of the public treasury.
All insurance is a form of derivative. Earthquake insurance on a house is a side bet on what the local fault system will do. A futures contract is a side bet on what the price of some commodity will do. Derivatives may be used as a form of speculation or - in the case of the homeowner or of the wheat farmer wanting to lock in the price for a portion of his crop - as a way to hedge against risk. To blame the current mess on derivatives is ridiculous. To claim regulation would have prevented it is to claim that the regulators would have been smarter than the bankers and brokers. I've seen no evidence to suggest this. And No European regulations rendered their banking systems immune from any of this.
What might have stopped or a least mitigated much of this mess is not allowing quasi-governmental organizations like Fannie and Freddie, who buy half the mortgages originated in this country, to become market makers in subprime loans so a bunch of people that should never have bought homes could do so. This bonehead play was courtesy of the same folks who claim they could have prevented all this with more regulation.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
5,986 Posts
The Dems will probably buy off on it, stupid as they are. We actually had a good sound banking system until the deregulation fanatics like Phil Gramm (Republican-Texas, naturally) began to tear down the regulatory system. We need a return to good, sound banking practices and a ban on derivatives-based investment schemes to stop the corporate looting of the public treasury. The cost of subsidizing the big business sector is literally unbelievable, but was caused and is exacerbated by the Bush regime.

Good to hear your voice on our forum Calgacus. Our European friends are always welcome.
So this if Phil Gramm's fault? Wasn't it President BILL CLINTON who liked his idea and signed his bill?

I mean the Dems are so quick to say,"Clinton gave us balanced budgets" yet when he signs the dereg-bill that's the Repbulicans fault.

Intellectual honesty isn't your side's strong suit is it?
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top