Gunboards Forums banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
356 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Haven't seen much I wanted lately and the Mausers have started chewing up the gun budget but when someone sends you an email with a list of Finns to pick from you are pretty much obliged to buy at least one right? I picked out this 1942 Izhevsk. SA mark and the D. Also has the pressure proof mark. War time stock. I like the Finns, gives you two pieces of history for one. And it has the blued bolt.





 

· Gold Bullet Member
Joined
·
10,013 Posts
1942 91-30 Izhevsk rifles grow on trees they are so common.......Add the SA stamp.....well now, we have a different duck here.......definately not the garden variety Mosin Nagant......rare? Well, no. Uncommon....well, kind of....Yes!

The numbers along the barrel, very different...?

Pahtu.
 

· Gold Bullet Member
Joined
·
10,013 Posts
Note to self..... Next fall I have to head to west Washington state during harvest season. I always wondered what you farmed out on that ranch Pahtu...... This explains it. Pahtu grows Mosins!;)
Yes, it an unknown fact that many of our Christmas trees look like the one below....



Buckeyesgt, the rifle looks legit as a Finned rifle should look, no doubt about that.

Caribou, I dunno why the Finns bother to D stamp 91-30 rifles unless the throat modification was needed to fire Finn 7.62x54r ammo & I don't think that would be necessary?

Many of my Finned 91-30s have the D stamp.

Pahtu.
 

· Silver Bullet Member
Joined
·
21,326 Posts
Why would the Finns proof an already used Rifle? Did it look that crudely made? or D mark a 91/30 ? Thats Big SA box.....no? Seems so......
Since we don't see other Finn captured guns that were powder charge tested, I would say that the crude Soviet manufacturing appearance theory is quite plausible. The Finn armorers obviously saw a need to proof this barrel, and then marked it as such. Way cool.

Additionally, to the other comment in the first reply, alluding to this being a humped gun, the evidence is starkly contrary. The [SA] is perfectly identical to line 12, column B: http://7.62x54r.net/MosinID/MosinMarks02.htm , and to Finnish Army mark shown here: http://mosinnagant.net/USSR/mosin_nagant_markings.asp.

The haloing can be seen around the serial numbers on the original finish. The stock appears similar to other period captured guns in finish, age, and wear. And it has never seen a Soviet refurbishment process.


Finally, did you allow any of your trees to grow to seed, Pahtu?
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top